No serious attempt at discussion, just 'good luck'?
The entire last few pages wasn't enough for you? I said I'm done for tonight, and I don't even know how to reply to that post, it made no sense to me.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
No serious attempt at discussion, just 'good luck'?
The entire last few pages wasn't enough for you? I said I'm done for tonight, and I don't even know how to reply to that post, it made no sense to me.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
it's not just racist right wingers who care what colour people are.
Plenty on the left obsess over race.
Perhaps we should do away with the Black Police Association. Operation Trident can go, too.
Ditto race hate crime legislation.
Ditto government funding that helps members of a certain ethnic group.
I'm sure you get the picture ...
Yes, good luck.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
Bottom line is you have no regard for British culture and that is why you reacted negatively to comments that opposed mass immigration.
No regard? Wrong. I have issues with it. It is very 'preach but don't practice', I do believe that. But that is not the same as having no regard.
I never reacted negatively to comments that opposed mass immigration, I myself (for the hundredth time) oppose uncontrolled immigration. I reacted negatively to comments about a non-white majority. And as promised, now that you've put words in my mouth again, I am done for tonight.
Your dislike of British culture is masquerading as a virtue.
I've claimed no virtue.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
So if I said all Pakistanis were misogynist that wouldn't be racist because Pakistan is a nation not a race. Got it.
All Pakistanis? All? No one said all.
If you said Pakistanis were generally misogynist and you had a good reason to assert that then what possible issue could I take with it?
Again though, nitpicking.
But would it be bigoted or prejudiced though?
I'm an XJW, not an SJW, so I don't care.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
You critique what people write as if you're peer reviewing an academic paper. Sometimes, I use rhetoric. Sorry, in future I'll write entirely in statistics and Harvard reference my sources for you.
I gave examples of how we don't live up to our own standards. Deal with the point, don't nitpick details.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
To say any race is monolithically anything is the very definition of racism.
It was a piece of poetic rhetoric based on prior use of the word monolithically, do you even understand what I mean by that?
And no, it's not racist, because the British are a nation, not a race.
If I'd said whites were, then it would be. The British have a culture, whites don't.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
And as I said the UK population is currently 86% white, 7.5% Asian and 3.3% Black so unless you are in favour of ongoing and accelerating mass immigration a white-majority is a permanent certainty.
And as I said, it was a principled argument. I'm not against the idea in principle, but I accept that only the way we could get there any time soon would be untenable. The problem is, there are people here who seem to be against it in principle. Are we sorted on that now?
You asserted that cultural preservation was not important.
No, just not as important as other things, like the fact that we are in the midst of the fastest mass extinction event ever.
Now you have revealed that you despise British culture.
No, I have issues with it. Is that allowed? Do I need to love it? I like aspects of it and dislike others, many others. Is British culture a monolith now?
Your masochism is the real issue here.
Tut tut. Ad hominem? Masochism is a form of self-flagellation (well, usually with the help of others). Criticising British culture is not self-flagellation because I am not British culture, I am an individual who lives in Britain, with my own pros and cons. You're getting too personal here so I think perhaps it's best to put this on ice for a few hours.
Focus on the issues, not my issues, they're none of your business.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
The country I live in can and will control its borders - I guaran-damn-tee it.
Good, I'm in favour of that. Why don't you find someone who is pro-uncontrolled immigration to argue with, because you haven't found that in me. I just don't care what colour people are and I'm not afraid of changes in demographic distribution.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
So if I said that Africans are monolithically lazy or Pakistanis are monolithically misogynist or Japanese are monolithically arrogant that would be racist. But you can say Brits are monolithically hypocritical and as long as you add that it is a result of 'our long cultural history' that's not racist.
Maybe you could write down the rules for me. It's so complicated. It's almost as if you can make any negative sweeping generalisation about about white westerners and that's okay. But never make a negative observation about any other people.
Which brings us back to the OP does it not?
Second option then. Got it. Thanks.
You can generalise all you like about any culture. As I did. I never said that was racist. The only thing I said was racist was calling for a white-majority nation.
It's almost as if you can make any negative sweeping generalisation about about white westerners and that's okay. But never make a negative observation about any other people.
The next time you put words in my mouth, I'm done.
asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
Me and the Sentinelese are Homo sapiens ... you have to treat us the same.
You are also Homo Sapiens with very different lives in very different parts of the world. With very different priorities.
we can iron out a few wrinkles but humans will always be tribalist. We've fought racism and xenophobia hard but we're still tribalist. Look at Spurs v Arsenal fans or United v City fans.
We should iron out those wrinkles as best we can. I'm not saying we can end tribalism, but we can do our best to keep it from controlling our actions and we can certainly stop venerating it. Football tribalism is very low-level, but even that leads to problems.
this is true but like tribalism it can be controlled, with wrinkles ironed out.
Migration isn't a force of nature that we just have to accept.
I agree, and have never disagreed. But I do think we need to accept that the change of skin tone distribution across the earth isn't an issue.